![trilian bass hammer ons and pull offs trilian bass hammer ons and pull offs](https://johnnycoxmusic.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/02/Featured-Image-6.jpg)
The 1073 has a 3-band EQ and there is also a post fader output. With the plugin, you can emulate a Neve preamp and then use the EQ to change the frequencies in your recording. Image credit: Universal Audio Check Universal Audio
![trilian bass hammer ons and pull offs trilian bass hammer ons and pull offs](https://guitarcoachmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/04/Pull-Off-Open.jpg)
The 1073 is the only end to end Neve 1073 emulation. The Neve 1073 is one of the most revered class A transistor mics and line amps that give total clarity, sheen, and bite to your recording. The Universal Audio Neve 1073 plugin is a channel amplifier that is one of the best preamp and EQ circuits to ever come out. Universal Audio Neve 1073 – Most Revered Preamp The 550B also has a feature called ‘proportional Q’ which automatically widens the filter bandwidth at its minimum settings and narrows it at its highest settings.īoth of the EQs are great for getting that classic sound that only vintage EQs can provide. The 550B offers 7 filter frequencies reaching up to 5 octaves per band (there are 4 bands) with bands 1 and 4 offering a shelf or peak filter if you so desire. The 550B is more of a sweetening EQ but can also be used to solve frequency problems that the 550A might not be able to fix. High and low EQ can be selected as either shelving or peaking, and you are also able to insert a band pass filter. That is what I am trying to get myself to do, lately, anyway.The 550A offers repeatable equalization at 15 frequency points and 5 different boosts that are then divided into 3 overlapping bands. Don't get me wrong, I love players, they are so much fun, but I have found it's good practice to pull out the guitar and strum out a starter song and record some lead parts, then introduce some player stuff on top of that. Probably because the guitar was/has been my instrument of choice for so many years, I'm pretty comfortable with the fretboard (why doesn't spell check know fretboard is a word?). I also find that my music takes a way more creative direction when I am playing a real instrument vs programming a chord progression via a player or sampled loops. It just added a lot to the song that a sample wouldn't have. ha ha) than sampled guitar parts, especially when I was doing hammer/pulls and other noodling "tricks." But even when I wasn't being fancy, just laying down an arpeggio with a few simple hammer/pulls in it.
![trilian bass hammer ons and pull offs trilian bass hammer ons and pull offs](https://bassmusicianmagazine.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/01/Holly-Franklin-Basschick-Bass-Lessons-2022.jpg)
But after some practice and a few takes the recordings sounded so much better (maybe better isn't the right word. I did some recording and was very disappointed with my loss of skills (it's true what they say, use it or lose it). I just recently pulled my guitars back out and dusted them off. Players have made me turn into a pretty lazy musician the last few years (also having a busy work schedule and children, etc). A sample library might have some samples of these, but they will never sound as convincing or authentic as a live recorded instrument played specifically for the song because of timing and pitch issues. One big problem with sampled guita is you will pretty much be missing all the hamm-ons and pull-offs, bends, slides, and other technical tricks.